Re: Why empty destructor in gtkmm HelloWorld example?
- From: michi7x7 <mailing-lists michi7x7 de>
- To: gtkmm-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Why empty destructor in gtkmm HelloWorld example?
- Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 13:58:31 +0100
Hi,
it's not needed.
With regards,
michi
Hello, can someone explain me what's the rule of the empty ~HelloWorld()
destructor in gtkmm Hello World example[1]? Actually base class
Gtk::Window destructor would be called anyway, whatever ~HelloWorld()
is defined or not, and it's not clear to me if it's just a redundant
statement, a convention or something that's really needed by gtkmm to
proper deallocate memory.
Thanks,
Francesco
http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtkmm-tutorial/unstable/sec-helloworld.html.en
_______________________________________________
gtkmm-list mailing list
gtkmm-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]