Re: gtkmm 2.18 Windows installer?
- From: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- To: Armin Burgmeier <armin arbur net>
- Cc: gtkmm-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: gtkmm 2.18 Windows installer?
- Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:57:24 +0200
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 20:44 +0200, Armin Burgmeier wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 20:33 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 19:14 +0200, Armin Burgmeier wrote:
> > > Is anyone keen on a Windows installer for gtkmm 2.18? There is no GTK+
> > > bundle yet, and Tor Lillqvist, the GTK+ Win32 maintainer, says this is
> > > because GTK+ 2.18 is still quite buggy on Windows (e.g. does not support
> > > the native Windows theme). As there are invidual zip packages for GTK+
> > > 2.18 I can still create an installer if people think we/they need one. I
> > > think it's not too useful at the moment.
> >
> > If GTK+ 2.18 is not good enough on Windows then I don't see much point
> > in a gtkmm 2.18 on Windows. Unless you just want to get more attention
> > for that bug. What's the bug URL?
>
> This is for the theme not working:
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=598299
>
> Otherwise gtk-demo seems to work well, though others have reported that
> their applications behave badly with GTK+ 2.18.
But without filing bugs?
It sounds like a gtkmm 2.18 installer would indeed be useful, and it
sounds like Tor should be encouraged to do a GTK+ installer. That would
mean that we all had the same stuff to work with, so we could get some
real information about those bugs.
--
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]