R: ListStore usage question
- From: "Marco La Porta" <marco-laporta tiscali it>
- To: "'Murray Cumming'" <murrayc murrayc com>
- Cc: gtkmm-list gnome org
- Subject: R: ListStore usage question
- Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 18:47:35 +0100
Yes, you are right, completely a no-sense question.
I don't know what I have drunk before writing previous email.
The strange thing is that I'm not be able to reproduce the problem, and I
have seen some problem (not sure at this point) before writing an email. All
seem to work fine.
Sorry and thank you for the response.
Marco
> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: Murray Cumming [mailto:murrayc murrayc com]
> Inviato: giovedì 15 gennaio 2009 18.17
> A: Marco La Porta
> Cc: gtkmm-list gnome org
> Oggetto: Re: ListStore usage question
>
> On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 01:53 +0100, Marco La Porta wrote:
> > I don't understand why the function TreeView::set_model deferences the
> > model
> > pointer (I see source code after a segfault), so that after such call
> > m_Model is no more valid.
>
> This doesn't make much sense. If you can post a simple compileable test
> case and/or a backtrace then maybe someone can show what your actual
> problem is.
>
> valgrind might also help. Really, try it. People often have to be told
> twice about valgrind, but wish that they had tried it the first time it
> was suggested.
>
> --
> murrayc murrayc com
> www.murrayc.com
> www.openismus.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]