Re: giomm API review needed



Marko Anastasov wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:56 AM, José Alburquerque
<jaalburquerque cox net> wrote:
Marko Anastasov wrote:
 > Some things and TODOs that caught my eye before going to sleep:
 >
 > - *Entry and *Point classes from gunixmounts.h still need to be wrapped
 >

 I think I may have made an error on UnixMount.  The only "gobject
 derived" class I see in gunixmounts.h is GUnixMountMonitor and not
 GUnixMount.

Ok, I didn't notice. But still, are they not part of the public API?
I'm not at home atm, and can't really see what's the story about
gunixmount.h and gunixmounts.h.

    Marko
Oops, I stand corrected. in gunixmount.h, there is a GUnixMount (gobject derived) while GUnixMountMonitor is defined in gunixmounts.h.

-Jose


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]