Re: Actions and UIManager vs. signals
- From: "Paul Davis" <pjdavis engineering uiowa edu>
- To: "Rainer Thaden" <RThaden web de>
- Cc: gtkmm-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Actions and UIManager vs. signals
- Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 09:28:40 -0600
Rainer,
This question has come up a bit on the list. As much as I've read,
most people seem to prefer working with the UIManager. I've just
finally started using it myself, and already I can tell you that I
like it quite a bit better already.
On 1/25/07, Rainer Thaden <RThaden web de> wrote:
Hi all,
I am starting to dive into gtkmm and try to develop a prototype app.
I built my main window with glade and read it with libglademm.
If I do so, I can just define signals for the menu items and connect them to my handler functions.
What is the advantage of not doing so and using actions and uimanage?
That I can enable and disable them together via one switch?
This is one of the benefits. I'm sure there are more. Personally I
think it makes my code quite a bit cleaner and easier to understand.
As far as I understand it, it is not possible to design these actions with Glade, right?
I didn't find too many examples for doing menus and menubars with libglademm.
If this is the wrong list, sorry for that.
The Menus And Toolbars chapter in th gtkmm book is a good example of
the UIManager.
http://www.gtkmm.org/docs/gtkmm-2.4/docs/tutorial/html/ch11.html
--
Regards,
Rainer
HTH,
Paul
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]