Re: Glibmm dynamic loading modules and libglademm

["Arthur Maciel" <arthurmaciel gmail com>]

Oh, thanks. That was the essential part of the question.
Thanks for the information about the macros. I´ve seen Dev-C++ made
some #define statements for the __declspec(dllexport) and (dllimport),
but didn´t know Glib had it. What a portability... Eventhough I don´t
know if I´m going to use the Glib macros, because I thought people
could develop dll for my plugin system without the need of GTKmm
development environment installed.
I´ll think about it...

Thanks again.
Arthur


2007/1/17, Daniel Elstner <daniel kitta googlemail com>:
> Am Dienstag, den 16.01.2007, 15:32 -0200 schrieb Arthur Maciel:
> > I´m trying to use Glibmm::Module to load dll´s and shared libs to make
> > a plugin system. Indeed it is working now on Windows. I have not tried
> > to run it on linux yet.
> > Nice portability of Glibmm stuff. Eventhough, if I want to create a
> > fully portable code between Windows and Linux I´ll have to use some
> > pre-processor definitions to include and exclude Win32 API specific
> > stuff, right?
>
> I don't know much about this, other than you should prefix function
> declarations with G_MODULE_EXPORT, which expands on Windows to the
> necessary declspec(dllexport), or whatever it was to mark functions for
> export in a DLL.  If you need separate code for the platforms, you can
> use the G_OS_WIN32 and G_PLATFORM_WIN32 preprocessor defines.  See the
> GLib documentation for the difference between these two macros, I don't
> remember the details.
>
> > Was that what you wanted to know?
>
> Actually, no.  I realize now that the wording of my reply was ambiguous.
> I was referring to the first part of question 2:
>
> > 2) When I load an interface with libglademm, if I have a notebook if
> > two pages and each contain a label called page_name, with get_widget()
> > how could I load the first page or the second page label? Is it
> > possible (to have same name for two widget on a .glade file)?
>
> Of this question, I only understood the part in parentheses, and that's
> the part I answered to.
>
> --Daniel