Re: glibmm thread safety
- From: Daniel Elstner <daniel kitta googlemail com>
- To: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- Cc: Chris Vine <chris cvine freeserve co uk>, gtkmm-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: glibmm thread safety
- Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 19:17:13 +0100
Am Montag, den 15.01.2007, 18:27 +0100 schrieb Murray Cumming:
> Sounds generally fine, as long as there's clear documentation saying
> when you should use it, and when not to use the other one.
>
> And if the existing method should not be used then it should be
> deprecated.
>
> I'd like to see the bug in bugzilla before it goes into svn, please.
I filed two bugs:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396958
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396963
> > In any case, the current plain connect() should of course be fixed too,
> > if at all possible. But that'll be more difficult than introducing the
> > alternative API.
>
> If that's actually possible, as an alternative to adding API, it sounds
> nicer.
I agree that it should be fixed, but the API addition is actually nice
for other uses besides threading, too. No strong feelings though.
--Daniel
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]