Re: Memory leak of RefPtr?

[Paul Davis <paul linuxaudiosystems com>]

On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 19:28 -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
> Rose,
> 
> On a side note, as a purely form of programming recommendation, there
> should almost never be a reason to create a pointer to a smart
> pointer.  (Invariably, there's got to be an exception to the case but
> I've never come across one yet) 

had to do this 3 weeks ago for a lock-free data structure system based
on a read-copy-update system. :)