Re: [cairo] Re: cairomm API/ABI freeze?

[Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>]

On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 09:49 -0600, Rick L Vinyard Jr wrote:
> Jonathon Jongsma wrote:
> > What about the following?
> > Cairo::Context::begin_new_path()
> > Cairo::Context::begin_new_sub_path()
> >
> > Advantages:
> > - retains a pretty close mapping to the C cairo functions
> > - retains an obvious parallellism between the two functions
> > - prefix 'begin_' makes it clear that we're not using 'new' in the C++ 
> > sense
> >
> > Disadvantages:
> > - ?
> >
> > Thoughts? opinions? alternate suggestions?
> >
> Sounds good. The 'begin_new_' prefix removes the C++ new operator 
> confusion that I think 'new_' alone presents.

Yes, it's good.

-- 
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com