Re: [cairo] Re: cairomm API/ABI freeze?
- From: Rick L Vinyard Jr <rvinyard cs nmsu edu>
- To: Jonathon Jongsma <jonathon jongsma gmail com>
- Cc: cairo cairographics org, Carl Worth <cworth cworth org>, gtkmm-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [cairo] Re: cairomm API/ABI freeze?
- Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 09:49:36 -0600
Jonathon Jongsma wrote:
What about the following?
Cairo::Context::begin_new_path()
Cairo::Context::begin_new_sub_path()
Advantages:
- retains a pretty close mapping to the C cairo functions
- retains an obvious parallellism between the two functions
- prefix 'begin_' makes it clear that we're not using 'new' in the C++
sense
Disadvantages:
- ?
Thoughts? opinions? alternate suggestions?
Sounds good. The 'begin_new_' prefix removes the C++ new operator
confusion that I think 'new_' alone presents.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]