Re: gtkmm capabilities

[Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>]

On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 11:24 +0100, Roel Vanhout wrote:
> Murray Cumming wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 20:03 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> >>I don't expect there to be many
> >>meaningful comments that would not be quickly put into the the original
> >>documentation, even if I'm forced to do it myself.
> > Actually I disagree with myself now after looking at the php comments.
> 
> Do you mean that as in 'there aren't many useful comments' or as in 
> 'there will be so many useful comments that it will be hard to 
> incorporate them all'?

The later.

> Anyway, I've put the patch, new file and description in the gtkmm 
> bugzilla (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=168030). The 
> description on how to get it working is short and assumes some basic 
> knowledge on how to set up a php/mysql application, if I need to clarify 
> things just add comments to the bugzilla.
> 
> I've noted it already in the bugzilla entry but I'll repeat it here to 
> be sure: I have not tested the makefile.am patch because I don't have an 
> automake environment. But what I mean is clear I think, so anyone with 
> basic automake knowledge should be able to correct any syntactical mistakes.

Thanks very much. I'll investigate that. I also want to investigate what
mono uses/used, in case it is more convenient.

-- 
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com