Re: [gtkmm] g++ 3.4
- From: Philippe Leroux <leroux00 yahoo fr>
- To: Tor Arvid Lund <tor arvid lund idi ntnu no>
- Cc: gtkmm-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [gtkmm] g++ 3.4
- Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:11:42 -0400
well *pbegin instead of *begin makes it compile
i'm installing now
and i'll see what happens
thought i'm not actually going to test this perticular widget for the
moment
if i understand the function
it appends the elements pointed to by pbegin up to pend to the this
so *begin would make more sence.
On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 10:50, Tor Arvid Lund wrote:
> Philippe Leroux wrote:
>
> >So then
> > TreePath::append(..)
> > appends elements of this to this ???
> >
> >that doesn't makes sence to me
> >ok, if i sound stupid just forget what i just said
> >i'm not into gtkmm developpment
> >so your the boss
> >
> >
> I am far from being the boss, it was just a lucky (or unlucky) guess.
> But in my defense, it already said this->push_back(*begin); , so I
> don't see why putting the extra parantheses suddenly makes it _that_ insane.
>
> It might have been wrong of me to submit it, since I can't say that I
> completely know what I'm doing, but I thought that Murray (or whoever
> merges patches), would instantly see if my changed line has the same
> meaning as before... All I _do_ know, is that it satisfied g++-3.4 :-)
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]