Re: [gtkmm] Custom TreeStore Problems
- From: Christof Petig <christof petig-baender de>
- To: Murray Cumming Comneon com
- Cc: palm nogui se, gtkmm-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [gtkmm] Custom TreeStore Problems
- Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 10:35:56 +0200
Murray Cumming Comneon com schrieb:
In this case, I am not convinced that enough research has been done to fix
the original performance problem. People don't seem to have this problem
Since it seems to relate to a tree being accessed by a sequential
iterator to mimic binary search (this clearly is a problem) there is no
way around that (besides adding a different style iterator (which
exhibits the tree nature) to GtkTreeStore - this might be an option if
this problem was more common). [I really should take a look into the
glib representation behind GtkTreeStore]
Another possibility is that passing _boxed_ types around too much sucked
on my performance. [column access being slow]
with GTK+, and Daniel didn't seem to have this problem with gtkmm in
regexxer. If someone can show that it's a gtkmm-specific problem then I
would like to investigate that.
perhaps the link below gives hints about that. To my knowledge the
performance problems of this example had not been researched (it seems
to be not pango, not treeview related (I have a patched version which
fills first and then attaches)).
Basically, I like to isolate problems, put them in bugzilla, and fix them.
I agree, but after three days of profiling (I used sprof on
(glib,gtk,gtkmm,pango-ft and -pg on a static variant of gtk,*mm) without
_any_ real results I have no idea on how to isolate the problem further.
But ... this does not yet explain the problem mentioned on the
gtk-app-devel list (see my previous post for the source). He did only
append.
I seem to have lost that. Do you have a link to the archives?
of course (it's in my sent folder)
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-list/2003-March/msg00361.html
Christof
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]