Re: [gtkmm] on_realize()!=signal_realize() ? , was: glade-2 + on_realize()

[Christof Petig <christof petig-baender de>]

Silviu D Minut schrieb:
> This may be so, but I'm not calling on_realize() in any constructor. In
> fact I'm not calling on_realize() at all. I thought on_realize() was
> suposed to be called automatically, when the window is beeing realized,
> hence (well) after the constructor has finished.
>
> Calling on_realize() in any constructor would defeat the purpose of
> on_realize():  usually on_realize() contains stuff that's not known upon
> construction, so no, I'm not doing that.

correct me if I'm wrong ... doesn't show() imply realize()? And show 
might get called in your ctor (or in window1_glade's ctor).

   Christof