Re: [gtkmm] ANNOUNCE: gtkmm 2.2.2

[Igor Gorbounov <igorbounov voronezh serw ru>]

Andrew E. Makeev wrote:

> Murray Cumming Comneon com wrote:
>
> > > From: Igor Gorbounov [mailto:igorbounov voronezh serw ru]   
> > > [...]
> I guess, Igor has been building test samples just from gtkmm source 
> tarball, and their's Makefiles do not looking for gtkmm libraries with 
> "pkg-config --libs gtkmm-2.0" nor "-L${prefix}/lib -lgtkmm -latkmm 
> ...", but just use libraries by relative paths from sources that just 
> has been built with configure/make.
>
> Let him try "g++ -o test `pkg-config --cflags --libs gtkmm-2.0` 
> <sample_file>", and see what happens then.

No, here, at work, I have a stable working gtkmm-2.2.1.rpm. But 
nevertheless, I didn't use
Makefiles from examples, I've just copied all text from an example about 
drawing area (scribble
something) in a test GTK+ project in Anjuta - I was just wondering some 
time ago if something
usefull may be done without gtkextra - and this test project made that 
very error message,
Andrew was talking about.
As for me, it is a problem with gtkmm.spec file - now, when no *.so* 
files are generated any more
the .spec file is no more relevant to this new package. I mean line 65 
(%{_libdir}/*.so) and
line 57 (%{_libdir}/*.so.*) of a .spec file.
Uph, sorry for my poor English.
   Igor Grobounov