[gtkmm] Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #379 - 3 msgs
- From: gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net
- To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
- Subject: [gtkmm] Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #379 - 3 msgs
- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 12:01:35 -0800
Send Gtkmm-forge mailing list submissions to
gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net
You can reach the person managing the list at
gtkmm-forge-admin lists sourceforge net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gtkmm-forge digest..."
gtkmm-forge is the mailing list that receives gtkmm bug reports from bugzilla. A daily digest is sent to gtkmm-main, to encourage people to help fixing the bugs.
Today's Topics:
1. [Bug 108914] Changed - Docs for Glib::Module (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
2. [Bug 108914] Changed - Docs for Glib::Module (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
3. [Bug 108971] Changed - Deriving from Glib::Object produces debug spew (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
--__--__--
Message: 1
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc:
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 08:38:31 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 108914] Changed - Docs for Glib::Module
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108914
Changed by r burton 180sw com
--- shadow/108914 Sat Mar 22 15:39:47 2003
+++ shadow/108914.tmp.30336 Mon Mar 24 08:38:31 2003
@@ -38,6 +38,11 @@
The documentation for the destructor seems to be superfluous. Of
course destructors release memory.,
std::strings can not be NULL. If the C function can take this then we
need to add a method overload without that parameter.
+
+------- Additional Comments From r burton 180sw com 2003-03-24 08:38 -------
+Created an attachment (id=15181)
+Updated patch
+
--__--__--
Message: 2
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc:
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 12:23:51 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 108914] Changed - Docs for Glib::Module
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108914
Changed by murrayc usa net
--- shadow/108914 Mon Mar 24 08:38:31 2003
+++ shadow/108914.tmp.10050 Mon Mar 24 12:23:51 2003
@@ -43,6 +43,22 @@
need to add a method overload without that parameter.
------- Additional Comments From r burton 180sw com 2003-03-24 08:38 -------
Created an attachment (id=15181)
Updated patch
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net 2003-03-24 12:23 -------
+So, I think this is based on the C docs?
+
+This should be applied to both branches with the following changes:
+
+s/operation=()/operator bool()/ - sorry, my typo.
+
+Near "It can be an empty string" there should be a "//TODO: " saying
+that we should add an override. Actually I suspect that an empty
+string != NULL so the documentation might be wrong. If so, we could
+fix our implementation to use null if the string is empty. A patch or
+TODO for that might be appropriate.
+
+Thanks, Ross.
+
--__--__--
Message: 3
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc:
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 12:25:21 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 108971] Changed - Deriving from Glib::Object produces debug spew
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108971
Changed by murrayc usa net
--- shadow/108971 Sat Mar 22 15:51:55 2003
+++ shadow/108971.tmp.11280 Mon Mar 24 12:25:21 2003
@@ -23,6 +23,9 @@
// constructor. TODO: Remove the g_warning()
g_warning("Object::Object(): Did you really mean to call this?");
...
Which makes my program produce tons of unnecessary (and not really
accurate) debug output. Just making sure the TODO doesn't get forgotten :-)
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net 2003-03-24 12:25 -------
+OK. By the way, why did you want to derive from Glib::Object?
--__--__--
_______________________________________________
Gtkmm-forge mailing list
Gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
End of Gtkmm-forge Digest
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]