[gtkmm] Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #379 - 3 msgs



Send Gtkmm-forge mailing list submissions to
	gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	gtkmm-forge-admin lists sourceforge net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gtkmm-forge digest..."


gtkmm-forge is the mailing list that receives gtkmm bug reports from bugzilla.  A daily digest is sent to gtkmm-main, to encourage people to help fixing the bugs.


Today's Topics:

   1. [Bug 108914] Changed - Docs for Glib::Module (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   2. [Bug 108914] Changed - Docs for Glib::Module (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   3. [Bug 108971] Changed - Deriving from Glib::Object produces debug spew (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)

--__--__--

Message: 1
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 08:38:31 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 108914] Changed - Docs for Glib::Module

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108914

Changed by r burton 180sw com 

--- shadow/108914	Sat Mar 22 15:39:47 2003
+++ shadow/108914.tmp.30336	Mon Mar 24 08:38:31 2003
@@ -38,6 +38,11 @@
 
 The documentation for the destructor seems to be superfluous. Of
 course destructors release memory.,
 
 std::strings can not be NULL. If the C function can take this then we
 need to add a method overload without that parameter.
+
+------- Additional Comments From r burton 180sw com  2003-03-24 08:38 -------
+Created an attachment (id=15181)
+Updated patch
+



--__--__--

Message: 2
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 12:23:51 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 108914] Changed - Docs for Glib::Module

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108914

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/108914	Mon Mar 24 08:38:31 2003
+++ shadow/108914.tmp.10050	Mon Mar 24 12:23:51 2003
@@ -43,6 +43,22 @@
 need to add a method overload without that parameter.
 
 ------- Additional Comments From r burton 180sw com  2003-03-24 08:38 -------
 Created an attachment (id=15181)
 Updated patch
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-03-24 12:23 -------
+So, I think this is based on the C docs?
+
+This should be applied to both branches with the following changes:
+
+s/operation=()/operator bool()/ - sorry, my typo.
+
+Near "It can be an empty string" there should be a "//TODO: " saying
+that we should add an override. Actually I suspect that an empty
+string != NULL so the documentation might be wrong. If so, we could
+fix our implementation to use null if the string is empty. A patch or
+TODO for that might be appropriate.
+
+Thanks, Ross.
+



--__--__--

Message: 3
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 12:25:21 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 108971] Changed - Deriving from Glib::Object produces debug spew

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108971

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/108971	Sat Mar 22 15:51:55 2003
+++ shadow/108971.tmp.11280	Mon Mar 24 12:25:21 2003
@@ -23,6 +23,9 @@
   // constructor.  TODO: Remove the g_warning()
   g_warning("Object::Object(): Did you really mean to call this?");
   ...
 
 Which makes my program produce tons of unnecessary (and not really
 accurate) debug output. Just making sure the TODO doesn't get forgotten :-)
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-03-24 12:25 -------
+OK. By the way, why did you want to derive from Glib::Object?




--__--__--

_______________________________________________
Gtkmm-forge mailing list
Gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge


End of Gtkmm-forge Digest



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]