[gtkmm] Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #447 - 16 msgs

From: gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Subject: [gtkmm] Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #447 - 16 msgs
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 03:23:06 -0700
Send Gtkmm-forge mailing list submissions to
	gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	gtkmm-forge-admin lists sourceforge net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gtkmm-forge digest..."


gtkmm-forge is the mailing list that receives gtkmm bug reports from bugzilla.  A daily digest is sent to gtkmm-main, to encourage people to help fixing the bugs.


Today's Topics:

   1. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   2. [Bug 113688] Changed - debian: No checkbox in TreeView for boolean fields (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   3. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   4. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   5. [Bug 110788] Changed - Atk/Gtk StateType confusion on widget page (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   6. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   7. [Bug 114867] Changed - signal_format_value() does not work (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   8. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   9. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  10. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  11. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  12. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  13. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  14. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  15. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  16. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)

--__--__--

Message: 1
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: murrayc usa net
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 01:55:21 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by harald bugzilla gnome org hopfes de 

--- shadow/114568	Wed Jun 25 16:32:41 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.28101	Thu Jun 26 01:55:21 2003
@@ -1363,6 +1363,10 @@
   {
     MyDialog d;
     int res = d.run();
   }
 ###############################
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From harald bugzilla gnome org hopfes de  2003-06-26 01:55 -------
+I didn't see the "gtk_vbox_new" inside the valgrind output. 
+Now it seems that the GtkVBox is not destroyed.



--__--__--

Message: 2
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, zsdebre telant tvnet hu
Cc: 
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 02:45:43 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 113688] Changed - debian: No checkbox in TreeView for boolean fields

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113688

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/113688	Wed Jun 25 03:18:17 2003
+++ shadow/113688.tmp.12091	Thu Jun 26 02:45:43 2003
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 Bug#: 113688
 Product: gtkmm
 Version: 2.2
 OS: Linux
 OS Details: Debian SID
-Status: NEW   
-Resolution: 
+Status: RESOLVED   
+Resolution: FIXED
 Severity: normal
 Priority: Normal
 Component: TreeView
 AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
 ReportedBy: zsdebre telant tvnet hu               
 TargetMilestone: ---
@@ -132,6 +132,9 @@
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-25 02:57 -------
 OK, well done guys. Cedric, please apply your patch.
 
 ------- Additional Comments From cgustin ibelgique com  2003-06-25 03:18 -------
 Seems you already applied the patch to both branches on 2003-06-14.
 I guess we can change the status of this bug to resolved.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-26 02:45 -------
+Oh, right, yes.



--__--__--

Message: 3
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: 
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 02:49:41 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/114568	Thu Jun 26 01:55:21 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.13524	Thu Jun 26 02:49:41 2003
@@ -1367,6 +1367,17 @@
 ###############################
 
 
 ------- Additional Comments From harald bugzilla gnome org hopfes de  2003-06-26 01:55 -------
 I didn't see the "gtk_vbox_new" inside the valgrind output. 
 Now it seems that the GtkVBox is not destroyed.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-26 02:49 -------
+Interesting. I think that we had an extra little hack in gtkmm 2.0
+that did a gtk_signal_connect() like you suggest that we should always
+do. grepping the tarball might confirm that. Maybe it was useful in
+more than just a special case. We simplified it for gtkmm 2.2, I think.
+
+Here is a very simple C test case that seems to show that the qdata
+callback is never called. It's confusing, because I'm sure it works
+sometimes in gtkmm. I need to check with the GTK+ mailing list that
+there is no error in this simple test case (gtk_qdata_callback.c).  



--__--__--

Message: 4
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: 
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 02:50:24 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/114568	Thu Jun 26 02:49:41 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.13890	Thu Jun 26 02:50:24 2003
@@ -1378,6 +1378,11 @@
 more than just a special case. We simplified it for gtkmm 2.2, I think.
 
 Here is a very simple C test case that seems to show that the qdata
 callback is never called. It's confusing, because I'm sure it works
 sometimes in gtkmm. I need to check with the GTK+ mailing list that
 there is no error in this simple test case (gtk_qdata_callback.c).  
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-26 02:50 -------
+Created an attachment (id=17788)
+gtk_qdata_callback.c
+



--__--__--

Message: 5
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, olau hardworking dk
Cc: dimitri stack nl
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 02:55:43 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 110788] Changed - Atk/Gtk StateType confusion on widget page

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110788

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/110788	Tue Jun 24 09:43:10 2003
+++ shadow/110788.tmp.15260	Thu Jun 26 02:55:43 2003
@@ -81,6 +81,17 @@
 Sorry for the long processing time (exams) - it doesn't work with
 1.3.2 either. The behaviour is exactly the same.
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-24 09:43 -------
 OK, I will add a dependent doxygen bug when the doxygen bugzilla 
 product is working.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-26 02:55 -------
+Dimitri said:
+In the new CVS release, this bug should have been solved (but better 
+check
+before closing the bug ;-)
+
+Dimitri, please reply in the bug instead of replying to the bug 
+notification emails. There is some email interface to bugzilla but I 
+don't know how it works.
+



--__--__--

Message: 6
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: 
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 03:19:50 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/114568	Thu Jun 26 02:50:24 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.22788	Thu Jun 26 03:19:49 2003
@@ -1383,6 +1383,22 @@
 there is no error in this simple test case (gtk_qdata_callback.c).  
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-26 02:50 -------
 Created an attachment (id=17788)
 gtk_qdata_callback.c
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-26 03:19 -------
+re the reinterpret_cast<GObjectClass*>(klass)->dispose =
+&dispose_vfunc_callback;:
+
+gtkmm has "derived" GObject "klasses" in which we set our gtkmm
+callbacks. Our gtkmm callbacks then call the original GTK+ callbacks
+in the original base "klasses", after doing anything special for
+gtkmm. You should see this if you explore the callback functions in
+gtkmm. It's intestersting, but I doubt it's relevant to this bug.
+
+As for your other test cases/problems, I'm not sure what the end
+result or question is now. I still want to investigate the simple
+qdata callback test case and replace it with a g_signal_connect() if
+necessary. It's good that you have tried that a bit already. But when
+we do it we would probably only want to use one callback, not both.



--__--__--

Message: 7
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, secil secil de
Cc: 
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 03:29:02 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114867] Changed - signal_format_value() does not work

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114867

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/114867	Tue Jun 10 14:17:51 2003
+++ shadow/114867.tmp.24830	Thu Jun 26 03:29:02 2003
@@ -61,6 +61,16 @@
 {
   char buffer[10];
   sprintf(buffer, "You choose '%d'", value);
   printf("Value is %d\n", value);
   return Glib::ustring(buffer);
 }
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-26 03:28 -------
+Someone needs to check that the value is correct when the signal is
+emmitted by GTK+. 
+
+If it is, the next step would be to try rewriting the example in GTK+
+C code to see if it is correct then.
+
+If it is not, then we need to find out why by exploring the callbacks
+in gtkmm, all of which should be in the scalewindow.cc file.



--__--__--

Message: 8
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: murrayc usa net
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 05:03:29 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by harald bugzilla gnome org hopfes de 

--- shadow/114568	Thu Jun 26 03:19:49 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.25535	Thu Jun 26 05:03:29 2003
@@ -1399,6 +1399,10 @@
 
 As for your other test cases/problems, I'm not sure what the end
 result or question is now. I still want to investigate the simple
 qdata callback test case and replace it with a g_signal_connect() if
 necessary. It's good that you have tried that a bit already. But when
 we do it we would probably only want to use one callback, not both.
+
+------- Additional Comments From harald bugzilla gnome org hopfes de  2003-06-26 05:03 -------
+Is that qdata really a callback. I understood that it just stores a
+pointer?



--__--__--

Message: 9
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: 
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 05:08:48 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/114568	Thu Jun 26 05:03:29 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.27028	Thu Jun 26 05:08:48 2003
@@ -1403,6 +1403,11 @@
 necessary. It's good that you have tried that a bit already. But when
 we do it we would probably only want to use one callback, not both.
 
 ------- Additional Comments From harald bugzilla gnome org hopfes de  2003-06-26 05:03 -------
 Is that qdata really a callback. I understood that it just stores a
 pointer?
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-26 05:08 -------
+Yes, the 4th parameter is a callback:
+http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/gobject/gobject-The-Base-
+Object-Type.html#g-object-set-qdata-full



--__--__--

Message: 10
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: murrayc usa net
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 05:14:27 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by harald bugzilla gnome org hopfes de 

--- shadow/114568	Thu Jun 26 05:08:48 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.29300	Thu Jun 26 05:14:27 2003
@@ -1408,6 +1408,26 @@
 pointer?
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-26 05:08 -------
 Yes, the 4th parameter is a callback:
 http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/gobject/gobject-The-Base-
 Object-Type.html#g-object-set-qdata-full
+
+------- Additional Comments From harald bugzilla gnome org hopfes de  2003-06-26 05:14 -------
+> Yes, the 4th parameter is a callback
+
+When is it supposed to be executed? (Inside what function?)
+Is it done automatically on object destruction?
+If yes, on what layer?
+
+- glib
+- gobject
+- gtk
+- glibmm
+- gtkmm
+
+> As for your other test cases/problems,
+> I'm not sure what the end result or question is now.
+
+The g_signal_connect causes the Gtk::VBox to be destroyed, but
+something created by gtk_vbox_new is not cleaned up.
+



--__--__--

Message: 11
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: murrayc usa net
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 05:23:08 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by harald bugzilla gnome org hopfes de 

--- shadow/114568	Thu Jun 26 05:14:27 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.650	Thu Jun 26 05:23:08 2003
@@ -1428,6 +1428,23 @@
 > As for your other test cases/problems,
 > I'm not sure what the end result or question is now.
 
 The g_signal_connect causes the Gtk::VBox to be destroyed, but
 something created by gtk_vbox_new is not cleaned up.
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From harald bugzilla gnome org hopfes de  2003-06-26 05:23 -------
+Docu for g_object_set_data_full:
+
+  Like g_object_set_data() except it adds notification for when the
+  association is destroyed, either by setting it to a different
+  value or when the object is destroyed. 
+
+Docu for g_object_unref:
+
+  Decreases the reference count if object.
+  When its reference count drops to 0, the object is finalized
+  (i.e. its memory is freed).
+
+There is also a function pointer "GObjectFinalizeFunc" but I dont know
+who sets it?
+



--__--__--

Message: 12
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: murrayc usa net
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 05:38:23 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by harald bugzilla gnome org hopfes de 

--- shadow/114568	Thu Jun 26 05:23:08 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.5884	Thu Jun 26 05:38:23 2003
@@ -1445,6 +1445,24 @@
   When its reference count drops to 0, the object is finalized
   (i.e. its memory is freed).
 
 There is also a function pointer "GObjectFinalizeFunc" but I dont know
 who sets it?
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From harald bugzilla gnome org hopfes de  2003-06-26 05:38 -------
+####################################################################
+
+Murray, you wrote on 2003-06-24 08:09:
+
+  Yes, I would expect anything from Glib::wrap() to be manage()ed.
+  The manage() just means that the lifetime will be controlled by
+  the GTK+ container, as per normal, not by anything in C++. 
+
+The manange you are thalking about is not the Gtk::manage(which is
+really a Sigc++::manage), or?
+
+If so, why does the Gtk::VBox_Class::wrap_new() contains a
+Gtk::manage() of the result pointer?
+
+####################################################################
+



--__--__--

Message: 13
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: 
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 05:39:40 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/114568	Thu Jun 26 05:38:23 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.6650	Thu Jun 26 05:39:40 2003
@@ -1463,6 +1463,10 @@
 
 If so, why does the Gtk::VBox_Class::wrap_new() contains a
 Gtk::manage() of the result pointer?
 
 ####################################################################
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-26 05:39 -------
+Let's just wait to hear what the glib developers say in reply to my 
+email about the gtk_qdata_callback.c test case.



--__--__--

Message: 14
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: 
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 05:41:30 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/114568	Thu Jun 26 05:39:40 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.7450	Thu Jun 26 05:41:29 2003
@@ -1467,6 +1467,15 @@
 ####################################################################
 
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-26 05:39 -------
 Let's just wait to hear what the glib developers say in reply to my 
 email about the gtk_qdata_callback.c test case.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-26 05:41 -------
+>> Yes, I would expect anything from Glib::wrap() to be manage()ed.If 
+> so, why does the Gtk::VBox_Class::wrap_new() contains a
+Gtk::manage() of the result pointer?
+
+So that it is manage()d, I suppose. I don't see any inconsistency 
+here.
+



--__--__--

Message: 15
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: murrayc usa net
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 06:20:05 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net 

--- shadow/114568	Thu Jun 26 05:41:29 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.21993	Thu Jun 26 06:20:04 2003
@@ -1476,6 +1476,11 @@
 > so, why does the Gtk::VBox_Class::wrap_new() contains a
 Gtk::manage() of the result pointer?
 
 So that it is manage()d, I suppose. I don't see any inconsistency 
 here.
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-26 06:20 -------
+Created an attachment (id=17792)
+gtk_qdata_callback_with_ref.txt
+



--__--__--

Message: 16
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: murrayc usa net
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 06:22:16 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net 

--- shadow/114568	Thu Jun 26 06:20:04 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.22665	Thu Jun 26 06:22:16 2003
@@ -1481,6 +1481,15 @@
 
 
 ------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-26 06:20 -------
 Created an attachment (id=17792)
 gtk_qdata_callback_with_ref.txt
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-26 06:22 -------
+Check my new attachment
+
+http://bugzilla.gnome.org/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=17792
+
+There is again the refcount of 3 and I would bet that this is the 
+problem.
+




--__--__--

_______________________________________________
Gtkmm-forge mailing list
Gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge


End of Gtkmm-forge Digest
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]