Re: [gtkmm] Questions and information
- From: Andrew <andrea sansottera fastwebnet it>
- To: Chris Vine <chris cvine freeserve co uk>
- Cc: gtkmm-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [gtkmm] Questions and information
- Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 22:34:12 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> Compatibility is from earlier version to later version. That is, anything
> that compiles with Gtk+ 2.0 should compile with Gtk+ 2.2. It would be
> silly to try to guarantee the reverse, or you could never make API
> additions.
I'm sorry, you're right... that's what happens with almost any API.
Anyway, if forward compatibility does not have to be guaranteed, I do not see
any reason to break backward compatibility between gtkmm 2.2 and gtkmm 2.4...
Even if new classes/functions has to be introduced, deprecated
classes/functions should be kept in the API till gtkmm 3.0.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+9hLLkL76YBIYEmwRAmkbAJ9h4xWcrok1npJmYTQYZObCQCtW3wCdF1vZ
blJv3SpvEbgju/O0PIWvjHA=
=YcOK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]