[gtkmm] Re: Gtkmm or Qt?
- From: Andreas Rottmann <a rottmann gmx at>
- To: Ruediger Sonderfeld <cplusplushelp gmx net>
- Cc: gtkmm-list gnome org
- Subject: [gtkmm] Re: Gtkmm or Qt?
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 15:46:24 +0200
Ruediger Sonderfeld <cplusplushelp gmx net> writes:
[Line-wrapping dajusted, please fix MUA]
> On 0, Murray Cumming Comneon com wrote:
>> > Dr Mark H Phillips wrote:
>> > > Also, development time might be slower because Glade isn't as
>> > > advanced as QtDesigner.
>>
>> By the way, Mark, I'd be interested to know what QtDesigner has that you
>> would miss with Glade.
>
> I don't know QtDesigner. But I think Glade isn't really usefull
> because writing the code is sepperated from the design process.
>
> First you have to design the GUI and than you can write your Code in
> the Code generated by Glade. If you have to change the GUI you have
> a problem because you must regenerate the code and then merge your
> code into the code generated by glade
>
> (or I never realised how to use glade a better way)
>
Use libglade or libglademm.
Regards, Andy
--
Andreas Rottmann | Rotty ICQ | 118634484 ICQ | a rottmann gmx at
http://www.8ung.at/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://www.8ung.at/rotty/gpg.asc
Fingerprint | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219 F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62
Make free software, not war!
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]