RE: [gtkmm] Gtkmm or Qt?

[Murray Cumming Comneon com]

> From: Markus Gerwinski [mailto:markus gerwinski de] 
> Dr Mark H Phillips wrote:
> > I am interested in people's views.  Is gtkmm (and gtk+) a serious
> > option for my company?  In particular I'm not sure whether serious
> > MS Windows support is there yet.  Also, development time might be
> > slower because Glade isn't as advanced as QtDesigner.

By the way, Mark, I'd be interested to know what QtDesigner has that you
would miss with Glade.

> Windows support is definitely there and runs good, at least 
> for Gtkmm 2.0. With
> consequent use of Autoconf/Automake you won't see a 
> difference between building
> a Gtkmm project on Linux or on W32 with MinGW. I ran into 
> problems using higher
> versions than 2.0, though,

Ideally you would point us to bugzilla bugs.

> but I'm positive this'll be fixed.

Not unless people know about them.

Murray Cumming
murrayc usa net
www.murrayc.com