RE: [gtkmm] Gtkmm or Qt?
- From: Dr Mark H Phillips <mark austrics com au>
- To: Murray Cumming Comneon com
- Cc: markus gerwinski de, Gtkmm List <gtkmm-list gnome org>
- Subject: RE: [gtkmm] Gtkmm or Qt?
- Date: 28 Aug 2003 12:06:27 +0930
On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 20:14, Murray Cumming Comneon com wrote:
> > From: Markus Gerwinski [mailto:markus gerwinski de]
> > Dr Mark H Phillips wrote:
> > > I am interested in people's views. Is gtkmm (and gtk+) a serious
> > > option for my company? In particular I'm not sure whether serious
> > > MS Windows support is there yet. Also, development time might be
> > > slower because Glade isn't as advanced as QtDesigner.
>
> By the way, Mark, I'd be interested to know what QtDesigner has that you
> would miss with Glade.
I am going on comments from colleagues who have looked at both, rather
than first-hand experience. They felt that QtDesigner was more advanced
and better thought out than Glade, but I don't know specifics. I need
to compare the two myself at some stage.
Cheers,
Mark.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]