Re: [gtkmm] Doing a 'catch-code' library for the propesed functionality cuts in SigC++

[MHL Schulze t-online de (Martin Schulze)]

Hi!

Short answer: I agree with Andi's plan but:

- I would pack all existing adaptors into the extra lib.
- The final plan should be to reintegrate the adaptors into the libsigc++
  main library when it finally will become more maintainable.
- From Andi's mail:

Am 25.07.2002 16:54 schrieb(en) Andreas Rottmann:
> (...) I'd like to propose the following:
>
> 1. Create a new SF project, called libsigcx
>
> 2. Create a build infrastructure for the project in CVS
>
> 3. Discuss what parts of my libSigCX should go into the new project
>    (hopefully all ;-)

  No, I don't want to see adaptors mixed with other functionality
  (see above and last mail).

Regards,

  Martin