GNOME.org
 

[gtkmm] Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #191 - 8 msgs

Send Gtkmm-forge mailing list submissions to
	gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	gtkmm-forge-admin lists sourceforge net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gtkmm-forge digest..."


gtkmm-forge is the mailing list that receives gtkmm bug reports from bugzilla.  A daily digest is sent to gtkmm-main, to encourage people to help fixing the bugs.


Today's Topics:

   1. [Bug 90474] Changed - Combo API is incomplete (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   2. [Bug 90126] Changed - Layout disturbances with gtkmm-1.3.19 (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   3. [Bug 90033] Changed - Crashes when doing anything (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   4. [Bug 90474] Changed - Combo API is incomplete (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   5. [Bug 90033] Changed - Crashes when doing anything (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   6. [Bug 90126] Changed - Box::pack_start() is not very typesafe. (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   7. [Bug 89951] Changed - gtkmm cvs doesn't compile with gcc 2.95.3 due to internal compiler error (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   8. [Bug 90126] Changed - Box::pack_start() is not very typesafe. (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)

--__--__--

Message: 1
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 16:10:27 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 90474] Changed - Combo API is incomplete

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90474

Changed by mhl schulze t-online de 

--- shadow/90474	Sun Aug 11 14:57:35 2002
+++ shadow/90474.tmp.4844	Sun Aug 11 16:10:26 2002
@@ -42,6 +42,14 @@
 Created an attachment (id=10414)
 Promised patch...
 
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-08-11 14:57 -------
 Martin, do you have cvs write access? If not, do you want it?
+
+------- Additional Comments From MHL Schulze t-online de  2002-08-11 16:10 -------
+I don't have cvs write access. I guess it might speed up things in
+future if you gave it to me, e.g. when it comes to improving the
+documentation etc. ... For bigger changes like the one in this bug
+report I would continue to ask for approval because my work for gtkmm
+is quite irregular and I'm afraid it will stay like this in the
+forseen future :)



--__--__--

Message: 2
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 17:55:45 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 90126] Changed - Layout disturbances with gtkmm-1.3.19

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90126

Changed by szombath bifab de 

--- shadow/90126	Sun Aug 11 08:33:18 2002
+++ shadow/90126.tmp.19279	Sun Aug 11 17:55:45 2002
@@ -369,6 +369,22 @@
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-08-11 08:33 -------
 re. the define proposal:
 - If we have a deprecated API then people will expect us to support
 _all_ of the deprecated GTK+ API. That's impossible at this stage.
 
 What would you suggest as an alternative to GTKMM_DEPRECATED?
+
+------- Additional Comments From szombath bifab de  2002-08-11 17:55 -------
+> re. the define proposal:
+> - If we have a deprecated API then people will expect us to support
+> _all_ of the deprecated GTK+ API. That's impossible at this stage.
+
+I dont see the point here. The fact that the old form of set_options,
+pack_start, and pack_end member functions of the box class was kept
+for backward compatibility reasons does not mean we have to support
+all of the deprecated GTK+ API. Just let us deprecate them because
+they dont fit with the wanted type safety standard of gtkmm2.
+
+> What would you suggest as an alternative to GTKMM_DEPRECATED?
+Maybe GTKMM_USE_DEPRECATED makes it more clear. I suppose that both
+names would be used with #ifdef, meaning that the default case is type
+safe one. That would be great.



--__--__--

Message: 3
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 18:26:20 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 90033] Changed - Crashes when doing anything

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90033

Changed by arne 123soft de 

--- shadow/90033	Thu Aug  8 05:53:00 2002
+++ shadow/90033.tmp.23163	Sun Aug 11 18:26:20 2002
@@ -57,6 +57,14 @@
 
 
 
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-08-08 05:52 -------
 That tarball is out now. Please test.
+
+------- Additional Comments From arne 123soft de  2002-08-11 18:26 -------
+I installed sigc++ 1.1.13 and gtkmm 1.3.19, and
+also fixed use of glib (gcc 2.95.3 version was loaded,
+as I found out with 'info sharedlibrary').
+The crash is gone! So it was either incompatibility
+between 3.0.1 and 2.95.3 libraries, or it was a bug
+and is fixed now (dunno). Thanks a lot!



--__--__--

Message: 4
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, MHL Schulze t-online de
Cc: 
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 04:06:23 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 90474] Changed - Combo API is incomplete

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90474

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/90474	Sun Aug 11 16:10:26 2002
+++ shadow/90474.tmp.26479	Mon Aug 12 04:06:23 2002
@@ -50,6 +50,17 @@
 I don't have cvs write access. I guess it might speed up things in
 future if you gave it to me, e.g. when it comes to improving the
 documentation etc. ... For bigger changes like the one in this bug
 report I would continue to ask for approval because my work for gtkmm
 is quite irregular and I'm afraid it will stay like this in the
 forseen future :)
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-08-12 04:05 -------
+I think this a good solution, and well implemented. Yes, even Daniel
+and I post patches for review.
+
+However:
+
+I would like more ChangeLog information about the list.m4 fix, and
+whether it fixes any other problems.
+I would like you to add something to the examples/book/combo example
+to test this new API.



--__--__--

Message: 5
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, arne 123soft de
Cc: 
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 04:07:28 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 90033] Changed - Crashes when doing anything

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90033

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/90033	Sun Aug 11 18:26:20 2002
+++ shadow/90033.tmp.26695	Mon Aug 12 04:07:28 2002
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 Bug#: 90033
 Product: gtkmm
 Version: 2.0
 OS: Linux
 OS Details: SuSE Linux 7.3 i686
-Status: NEW   
-Resolution: 
+Status: RESOLVED   
+Resolution: NOTABUG
 Severity: critical
 Priority: Normal
 Component: general
 AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
 ReportedBy: arne 123soft de               
 TargetMilestone: ---



--__--__--

Message: 6
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, szombath bifab de
Cc: 
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 04:13:50 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 90126] Changed - Box::pack_start() is not very typesafe.

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90126

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/90126	Sun Aug 11 17:55:45 2002
+++ shadow/90126.tmp.27533	Mon Aug 12 04:13:50 2002
@@ -9,13 +9,13 @@
 Priority: Normal
 Component: build
 AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
 ReportedBy: szombath bifab de               
 TargetMilestone: ---
 URL: 
-Summary: Layout disturbances with gtkmm-1.3.19
+Summary: Box::pack_start() is not very typesafe.
 
 With the new release we see under Solaris/Sparc (both compiled by g++ and
 Forte C++) some layout distortions. Gtk::SHRINK does not seem to work
 anymore.
 
 This seems to be connected with the following run-time warning
@@ -385,6 +385,16 @@
 they dont fit with the wanted type safety standard of gtkmm2.
 
 > What would you suggest as an alternative to GTKMM_DEPRECATED?
 Maybe GTKMM_USE_DEPRECATED makes it more clear. I suppose that both
 names would be used with #ifdef, meaning that the default case is type
 safe one. That would be great.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-08-12 04:13 -------
+I think it would create confusion, and then disatisfaction. If we
+support any part of the deprecated API, or use a deprecation system
+such as that used in GTK+ then people will expect us to support all of
+the deprecated API. It should always be clear what part of GTK+ is
+wrapped, and what is not.
+
+If this is important to you then please discuss it concisely on the
+list. I think that the disadvantages are greater than the advantages.



--__--__--

Message: 7
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, MHL Schulze t-online de
Cc: szombath bifab de
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 13:41:49 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 89951] Changed - gtkmm cvs doesn't compile with gcc 2.95.3 due to internal compiler error

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89951

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/89951	Sun Aug 11 08:35:27 2002
+++ shadow/89951.tmp.5098	Mon Aug 12 13:41:48 2002
@@ -249,6 +249,9 @@
 ------- Additional Comments From MHL Schulze t-online de  2002-08-10 15:18 -------
 The editable cells demo works as expected with the latest patch!
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-08-11 08:35 -------
 Michael, could you test this last patch? Maybe the examples will now
 work with Forte without your #ifdefs.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-08-12 13:41 -------
+Well, I applied it anyway.



--__--__--

Message: 8
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 13:58:57 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 90126] Changed - Box::pack_start() is not very typesafe.

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90126

Changed by szombath bifab de 

--- shadow/90126	Mon Aug 12 04:13:50 2002
+++ shadow/90126.tmp.7264	Mon Aug 12 13:58:57 2002
@@ -395,6 +395,15 @@
 such as that used in GTK+ then people will expect us to support all of
 the deprecated API. It should always be clear what part of GTK+ is
 wrapped, and what is not.
 
 If this is important to you then please discuss it concisely on the
 list. I think that the disadvantages are greater than the advantages.
+
+------- Additional Comments From szombath bifab de  2002-08-12 13:58 -------
+I'm confused by your statement. In my eyes it was your wish to keep
+some old functions for backward compatibility reasons, not mine. My
+point was, that some of them break the type safety of the enum
+parameters of other overloaded functions.
+
+I agree that this bug should be closed now.
+




--__--__--

_______________________________________________
Gtkmm-forge mailing list
Gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge


End of Gtkmm-forge Digest
[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]