Re: Glib::[gs]et_prgname

On 02/01/2020 20:31, Torsten Schönfeld wrote:
If setting $0 does not achieve what you need, I see no problem in adding
the bindings.  Patches welcome.  Otherwise I'll add it to my list, but I
don't know when I'll be able to get to it.

How about this?



Attachment: 0001-Glib-gs-et_prgname.patch
Description: Text Data

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]