Re: GtkGC shared auto-release

[muppet <scott asofyet org>]

On Jan 14, 2008, at 6:28 PM, Torsten Schoenfeld wrote:

> On Tue, 2008-01-01 at 21:37 -0500, muppet wrote:
>
> > Should we just add this DESTROY override to the bindings?  (Taking
> > care to retain compatibility with code that calls ->release
> > explicitly, of course.)
>
> Yes, I think that would make sense.  The only approach I can think  
> of is
> actually the one Kevin implemented.  Attached is an adaptation of it.
> The in-place wrapping of Gtk2::GC methods makes it look and feel  
> rather
> dirty.  Is there a better way?

Not sure if it's really better, but how about a more hermetically- 
sealed modification of the methods themselves?

Attachment: gtkgc-xs.patch
Description: Binary data

--
The one difference between Dali and a crazy man is very simple: Dali  
is not crazy at all.
  -- Salvador Dali