Re: Subclasses, tied hashes, {get,set}_property, undefined values
- From: muppet <scott asofyet org>
- To: gtk2-perl List <gtk-perl-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Subclasses, tied hashes, {get,set}_property, undefined values
- Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 15:13:27 -0500
On Nov 18, 2007, at 3:05 PM, Torsten Schoenfeld wrote:
So, does this make sense? Is the benchmark sound, or are there cases
which are slowed down measurably by this patch? Is the
name gperl_sv_defined good, or are there better alternatives?
Sounds like a good idea to me. I'm sure Gtk2 and friends contain lots
more places where this would be necessary... I'm not really concerned
by how much this might slow things down, because any performance gain
we were getting was based on not doing everything we should've been
doing.
gperl_sv_defined() should be okay.
Since you added it to gperl.h, be sure to add gperl_sv_defined to the
exports list, or there will be a bug report about the windows
build. ;-)
--
The one difference between Dali and a crazy man is very simple: Dali
is not crazy at all.
-- Salvador Dali
- References:
- Subclasses, tied hashes, {get,set}_property, undefined values
- Re: Subclasses, tied hashes, {get,set}_property, undefined values
- Re: Subclasses, tied hashes, {get,set}_property, undefined values
- Re: Subclasses, tied hashes, {get,set}_property, undefined values
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]