Re: Correct use of pixbuf, pixmap, and image?

[muppet <scott asofyet org>]

On Mar 20, 2006, at 3:59 PM, Ari Jolma wrote:

> muppet wrote:
>
> > Ari Jolma wrote:
> >
> > > looking at process info, it seems that X is piling up memory, the  
> > > code
> > >    $self->{pixmap} = $self->{pixbuf}->render_pixmap_and_mask;
> > >    $self->{image}->set_from_pixmap($self->{pixmap});
> I've still seem to have a problem with this. I did a bit of  
> research and it seems that GtkImage's set_from_pixmap increases the  
> ref_count of the pixmap, thus the pixmap ends up with two ref_count  
> two (I build NOISY Glib to confirm this) and thus X does not free  
> its memory.
Yes.  Because there's one reference owned by the GtkImage and another  
owned by the perl scalar wrapper, which is held by the $self instance  
hash.  The pixmap will not be freed until *both* of these references  
are released.

> Is there a way to unset the pixmap from the image or force the  
> destroying of the pixmap? Recreating the image at this point in  
> code does not work right away.
You can unset the GtkImage with

   $self->{image}->set_from_pixbuf (undef, undef);

but you'll still need to release the pixmap from $self with

   $self->{pixmap} = undef;

or

   delete $self->{pixmap};



--
Examples really shouldn't include unexploded ordnance.
  -- Joe Smith, referring to an example program i wrote.