Re: Correct use of pixbuf, pixmap, and image?
- From: Ari Jolma <ari jolma tkk fi>
- To: Ari Jolma <ari jolma tkk fi>
- Cc: gtk-perl-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Correct use of pixbuf, pixmap, and image?
- Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 00:31:17 +0200
Ari Jolma wrote:
looking at process info, it seems that X is piling up memory, the code
$self->{pixmap} = $self->{pixbuf}->render_pixmap_and_mask;
$self->{image}->set_from_pixmap($self->{pixmap});
I've still seem to have a problem with this. I did a bit of research
and it seems that GtkImage's set_from_pixmap increases the ref_count
of the pixmap, thus the pixmap ends up with two ref_count two (I build
NOISY Glib to confirm this) and thus X does not free its memory.
Is there a way to unset the pixmap from the image or force the
destroying of the pixmap? Recreating the image at this point in code
does not work right away.
Sorry for flooding. I tested a simple xs function which is essentially this:
while (object->ref_count > 1) {
g_object_unref (object);
}
which I call with pixmap once I'm sure it is not used any more (after
new one is created and set to the image). The while is needed because
set_from_pixmap might be called several times to refresh the image on
the screen. After using this the X server does not pile up memory any more.
I could not find any example where pixmap is used this way as an
offscreen drawable.
Ari
_______________________________________________
gtk-perl-list mailing list
gtk-perl-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-perl-list
- References:
- Correct use of pixbuf, pixmap, and image?
- Re: Correct use of pixbuf, pixmap, and image?
- Re: Correct use of pixbuf, pixmap, and image?
- Re: Correct use of pixbuf, pixmap, and image?
- Re: Correct use of pixbuf, pixmap, and image?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]