Re: Cairo 0.91 (beta)
- From: Sergei Steshenko <sergstesh yahoo com>
- To: Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch gmx de>, gtk-perl-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Cairo 0.91 (beta)
- Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 13:16:09 -0700 (PDT)
--- Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch gmx de> wrote:
On Sun, 2006-08-13 at 07:25 -0700, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
Before/(along with) making a release, could you, developers, please
publish regression tests logs with versions of all the tools involved ?
I'm not quite sure what this would buy you. Before we make tarball
releases, we run the test suite and make sure no tests fail for us. If
the test suite fails for you, then there's either some problem with your
development environment or a bug in the test suite. In either case, a
bug report on bugzilla would be welcome.
That is, is there an orderly (from the QA point of view) release
Well, we run 'make distcheck', 'make disttest', and, if everything's
fine, 'make dist' to produce the tarball. Anything wrong with that?
What would be more "orderly"?
gtk-perl-list mailing list
gtk-perl-list gnome org
I would like to see log file(s) showing versions of libraries tested
together, like one can see in the log file:
produced by my tool.
That would add clarity to issues like this:
Applications From Scratch: http://appsfromscratch.berlios.de/
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
] [Thread Prev