Re: cool stuff in cvs head
- From: Bjarne Steinsbø <bosteins broadpark no>
- To: muppet <scott asofyet org>
- Cc: gtk-perl-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: cool stuff in cvs head
- Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 19:25:33 +0100
muppet wrote:
Bjarne Steinsbø said:
BTW, it compiles cleanly on my
system, but not all tests run successfully in Gtk2.
which tests fail?
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e"
"test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t
t/00.Gtk2.................ok
t/01.GtkWindow............ok
t/02.GtkButton............ok
t/03.GtkGammaCurve........ok
t/04.GtkSocket-GtkPlug....ok 3/4Gtk-CRITICAL **: file gtkxembed.c: line
188 (_gtk_xembed_send_focus_message): assertion `GDK_IS_WINDOW
(recipient)' failed at t/04.GtkSocket-GtkPlug.t line 87.
t/04.GtkSocket-GtkPlug....ok
t/05.GtkListStore-etc.....ok
t/06.GtkLabel.............ok
t/07.GtkBoxes.............ok
t/08.GtkCombo.............ok
t/09.GtkRadioButton.......ok
t/10.GtkProgressBar.......ok
t/11.GtkStatusBar.........ok
t/12.GtkDialog............ok
t/13.GtkTooltips..........ok
t/14.GtkToolbar...........ok
t/15.GtkHandleBox.........ok
t/16.GtkMenu-etc..........ok
t/17.GtkItemFactory.......ok
t/18.GtkNotebook..........ok
t/19.GtkSimpleList........ok
t/20.GdkColor.............ok
t/21.GtkContainer.........ok
t/22.GtkListStore.........ok
t/23.GtkTreeStore.........ok
t/24.GtkTreeView..........ok
t/25.GtkTreeSelection.....ok
t/26.GtkSimpleMenu........ok
t/27.GtkClipboard.........ok
t/30.GtkCellRenderer......ok 29/21# Looks like you planned 21 tests but
ran 8 extra.
t/30.GtkCellRenderer......dubious
Test returned status 8 (wstat 2048, 0x800)
DIED. FAILED test
Failed 0/21 tests, 100.00% okay
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
t/30.GtkCellRenderer.t 8 2048 21 0 0.00%
Failed 1/29 test scripts, 96.55% okay. -8/855 subtests failed, 100.94% okay.
make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 2
I'm running perl-5.8.0 (haven't upgraded yet), Gnome-2.4 with associated
libraries, and gcc-3.2.2. (It's starting to show that it's several
months since I last update the tool-chain....). Compiled with "-O3
-march=athlon-mp", and my perl is compiled with threading support.
- After using the popup to select a new entry, the treeview will
consider a dnd operation to have started as soon as the cursor enters
the window. Looks really weird... The "workaround" is for the user to
do the drop outside the window... I've tried various stuff to try to
track this one down, but no luck so far.
i can duplicate this. it has something to do with how the mouse events are
being handled, which is something that i tend to figure out only by trial and
error, but appears to be related only to app code, not the bindings. i'll get
back to you on that.
I'll keep looking also, just don't expect me to find anything...
Anyway,
the problem is that the window doesn't update correctly when expanding
the list. This causes the renderers to put data the data at the
position they used before, not to the new position....
i think this is a side effect of the fact that your columns are resizable.
I hadn't tested that... (clickety, clickety...) But nope, that's not
it. I turned off resizable, and even dropped reorderable and the
center-alignment, but no change.
Does that mean that you don't see it?
Does anybody have some working code of how to listen in to all the
signal activity going on in a Gtk2 app? There seems to be a way to
listen in to the signals using g_signal_add_emission_hook(), and this
certainly could be useful for debugging purposes. But the xs-code is
commented out. What's the full story?
most of that sort of thing is unwrapped because of either lack of interest
(yet) or the thought that "gee, that's esoteric, let's look at other stuff
first."
you may be more interested in monitoring all events, rather than single
signals (some don't allow hooks, you see). you should be able to uncomment
the necessary functions and play with them as you like; if you have any
problems, email me offlist and i'll help you out (some of them require
callbacks, which aren't straightforward if you aren't used to C).
As I feared then. I'm on my own... No promises on me spending much
time on this, but I still feel that it could be useful. (Going away to
read some more documentation.... Ahhh! So *that's* where the
ocumentation about events have been hiding) Ah, I see what you mean by
listening in to the events and not the signals. It seems that Gdk has
some useful functions, provided Gtk is compiled in some kind of debug
mode. I might have a go at this, probably combining it with setting up
a test-environment for 2.5.
Off the top of your head, do you know if signals are implemented by
stuffing artificial events back on the event-queue, or do they take a
more direct route? Please don't bother spending time on this, just in
case you should happen to know...
Bjarne
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]