Re: SimpleList->new_from_treeview

[muppet <scott asofyet org>]

On Wednesday, October 1, 2003, at 03:38 PM, Jaap Karssenberg wrote:

> I noticed that new_from_treeview doesn't complain when the treeview arg
> doesn't exist - cost me half a day bug hunting :((
> Maybe an argument check could be inserted ?

if you supply undef for the widget, it creates a new one.  that's a 
side effect of the way it's implemented --- ->new is now a call to 
->new_from_treeview.  perhaps they both need to be error-checking front 
ends to a constructor?

ah.  i had documented the fact that undef results in a new widget being 
created, but apparently that documentation didn't make it into cvs.  
sorry about that.

--
muppet <scott at asofyet dot org>