Re: gtk2-perl licenes (was: Re: gtk2-perl now available from CVS)
- From: goran kirra net
- To: Joern Reder <joern zyn de>
- Cc: gtk-perl-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: gtk2-perl licenes (was: Re: gtk2-perl now available from CVS)
- Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 12:01:08 +0200
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 11:37:47PM +0200, Joern Reder wrote:
goran kirra net wrote:
http://sourceforge.net/cvs/?group_id=64773
Great. I browsed a bit through the repository and I have a question
regarding the license of gtk2-perl.
The widget classes are licensed under LGPL, while other files are under
GPL/Artistic, like Perl itself. I think this should be consistent. I'd
vote for GPL/Artistic, because that's the usual license for Perl modules
and has proved itself for a long time.
I choose LGPL for the module since Gtk+ itself uses that license
and so does pygtk. By choosing the same licence we can review and
even "steal" snippets without license worries.
Besides LGPL gives you about the same priviliges as GPL+Artistic
so I don't think it is a big thing to worry about.
For examples other non-module code the author can choose whatever
license he/she wants.
regards,
--
Göran
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]