Re: gtk+-2.0 perl status questions

[Scott Smith <ssmith watson wustl edu>]

Thanks for the information!  I'll try to find lupus there.

Did he mention whether he was working with Nathan, or whether he was
doing this alone or with others we don't know about here?

Nathan posted to the list and asked if anyone was working on this, and
no one responded.  I hope we don't end up with two projects going here.

Has anyone working on this talked with Lupis?

Nathan, are you reading this?

Scott Smith
Informatics
Genome Sequencing Center
Washington University School of Medicine



On Tue, 2002-05-07 at 19:18, Stéphane Payrard wrote:
> Lupis (alias Paolo Molaro) is often hanging the irc.rhizome.net at
> #poe and #perl of irc.rhizome.net. He told me that he is working on
> supporting gtk 2.0.  Also the gui for Qt is speaking of updating the
> perl bindings.
> I hate so see this cool toolkit unsufficiently supported by the perl
> communauty while ruby and python are spreading everywhere.
>
> --
>  Stéphane
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 02:19:39PM -0500, Scott Smith wrote:
> > I've been following some of the discussion of the port to gtk+ 2.0, and
> > I have a few questions for anyone involved:
> >
> >
> > 1. Paolo Molaro and Kenneth Albanowski are listed as authors for Gtk.pm,
> > but I haven't seen them as part of the discussion of the gtk 2.0 port. 
> > Are you guys out there?  Any additional docs on your port of Gtk 1.x to
> > perl?
> >
> > 2. Paolo Molaro seems to be the maintainer of the gtkperl web site.
> > There's nothing about v 2.0 on the site, and the news hasn't been
> > updated since June 2001.  Has there been any discussion of passing-on
> > maintainer-ship to someone else if he's moved-on to other things? 
> > Considered a sourceforge site?
> >
> > 3. I'd love to contribute, though my knowledge of xs is nill.  I grabbed
> > Nathan Mueller's source.  Some more info on your overall plan and what
> > you view the state of the code to be would be great.  Specifically:
> >
> >     an overview of how you intend Gtk.pm to work
> >     what you haven't figure out yet
> >     what is incomplete
> >     what is broken
> >
> > 4. Is this port best as its own mailing list, or as part of the general
> > gtk-perl list?
> >
> > Any info anyone can provide on the state of this thing would be great.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Scott Smith
> > Informatics
> > Genome Sequencing Center
> > Washington University School of Medicine
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gtk-perl-list mailing list
> > gtk-perl-list gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-perl-list