Re: gtk+-2.0 perl status questions

[Gavin Jefferies <gj262 yahoo com>]

Are there any groups/companies out there using this and willing to
fund a 2.0 port? I know some companies must be using perl/Gtk in their
test labs instead of Tcl/Tk or others. I'd be willing to work on this
now if so. Otherwise I'll wait like most until it becomes pressing or
automagically gets done.

Gavin
--
http://emptytreeseedy.sf.net/


Scott Smith <ssmith watson wustl edu> writes:

> I've been following some of the discussion of the port to gtk+ 2.0, and
> I have a few questions for anyone involved:
>
>
> 1. Paolo Molaro and Kenneth Albanowski are listed as authors for Gtk.pm,
> but I haven't seen them as part of the discussion of the gtk 2.0 port. 
> Are you guys out there?  Any additional docs on your port of Gtk 1.x to
> perl?
>
> 2. Paolo Molaro seems to be the maintainer of the gtkperl web site.
> There's nothing about v 2.0 on the site, and the news hasn't been
> updated since June 2001.  Has there been any discussion of passing-on
> maintainer-ship to someone else if he's moved-on to other things? 
> Considered a sourceforge site?
>
> 3. I'd love to contribute, though my knowledge of xs is nill.  I grabbed
> Nathan Mueller's source.  Some more info on your overall plan and what
> you view the state of the code to be would be great.  Specifically:
>
>       an overview of how you intend Gtk.pm to work
>       what you haven't figure out yet
>       what is incomplete
>       what is broken
>
> 4. Is this port best as its own mailing list, or as part of the general
> gtk-perl list?
>
> Any info anyone can provide on the state of this thing would be great.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Scott Smith
> Informatics
> Genome Sequencing Center
> Washington University School of Medicine
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gtk-perl-list mailing list
> gtk-perl-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-perl-list