OT: PerlQT
- From: Joe Smith <jes martnet com>
- To: gtk-perl-list gnome org
- Subject: OT: PerlQT
- Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 20:20:04 -0500
Somewhat off-topic, but I just happend to notice that the Perl wrapper
for Qt is alive and kicking: http://perlqt.infonium.com/
I decided to use Perl-Gtk about two years ago because 1) I just couldn't
get my head around C++ and 2) PerlQt seemed to be a dead horse. I'm
happy to see that's not the case (well, I still don't grok C++) and
there seems to be a complete wrapper for Qt3.
It's interesting to compare how they handled some things. From a first
look, there seems to be a good bit of weirdness (at least for someone
coming from Perl). E.g., widgets are constructed not by 'new' but using
the bare class name, a la C++. Also suprising: Perl widgets subclassed
from Qt may provide virtual methods simply by defining a Perl sub with
the same name.
Anyway, I have no time for any useful analysis, but these two lines
popped out at me from the overview
(http://perlqt.infonium.com/dist/current/doc/index.html):
> It is based on the SMOKE library, a language independent low-level
> wrapper generated from Qt headers by Richard Dale's kalyptus thanks to
> David Faure's module.
and
> When building a new composite widget, you may just create its
> different parts inside my variables, since widgets are only deleted by
> their parents and not necessarily when their container goes out of
> scope.
>
> In other words, PerlQt performs clever reference counting to prevent
> indesirable deletion of objects.
<Joe
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]