Re: [gtk-osx-users] Is it ossible to built GTK-OSX on Lion?



On Oct 4, 2011, at 3:09 PM, John Ralls wrote:

> 
> On Oct 4, 2011, at 11:26 AM, John Ralls wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Oct 4, 2011, at 10:09 AM, Grigory Petrov wrote:
>> 
>>> Hello.
>>> 
>>> Thanks for response! The attached log is a result of execution:
>>> ~/.local/bin/jhbuild bootstrap &> log.txt
>>> 
>>> OS is OSX Lion 10.7 with Xcode 4.1 installed. It was restored from VM snapshot before performing test.
>>> I have answered "no" to Lion prompt for Java installation (same error if i accept java install).
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> Grigory
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:38 PM, John Ralls <jralls ceridwen us> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Oct 4, 2011, at 2:38 AM, Grigory Petrov wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hello.
>>>> 
>>>> I have installed Lion from burned DVD, download and installed latest 4.1 XCode and have tried to install GTK-OSX following this instructions:
>>>> http://live.gnome.org/GTK+/OSX/Building
>>>> 
>>>> It fails to bootstrap with following error:
>>>> 
>>>> "stpncpy.c:34: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before numeric constant"
>>>> 
>>>> Is Lion not supported yet?
>>> 
>>> Lion is supported, and although I haven't yet tested a build with the latest modulesets, was able to build before. What module of bootstrap failed? Could you provide a bit more context, everything from the last compilation statement perhaps?
>>> 
>>> Also, did you specify an SDK?
>> 
>> Ah. I saw that bug in another package, but now I can't remember where, or find it. 
>> 
>> I'll look at dealing with it for libxml2; in the meantime building against the 10.6 SDK should work.
>> 
> 
> Oops, sorry, that's in Gettext, not libxml2... and that's where I saw the bug,
> too:
> 
> http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?33999
> 
> Unfortunately, the patch on that bug doesn't work -- they've substantially changed the arrangement of gettext's code. I'll have a working patch sometime this week.

The patch is installed and works correctly now. You'll need to rerun gtk-osx-build-setup.sh to install it.

Regards,
John Ralls



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]