On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:28 AM, John Ralls <jralls ceridwen us> wrote:
> On Dec 22, 2014, at 9:11 AM, Philip Chimento <philip chimento gmail com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 9:04 AM, John Ralls <jralls ceridwen us> wrote:
>
>> On Dec 21, 2014, at 9:09 PM, Philip Chimento <philip chimento gmail com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 12:39 PM, John Ralls <jralls ceridwen us> wrote:
>>
>> > On Dec 16, 2014, at 12:25 AM, Philip Chimento <philip chimento gmail com> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:01 AM, John Ralls <jralls ceridwen us> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Dec 14, 2014, at 10:14 PM, Philip Chimento <philip chimento gmail com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:15 PM, John Ralls <jralls ceridwen us> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > On Dec 8, 2014, at 3:37 PM, Philip Chimento <philip chimento gmail com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 5:05 PM, John Ralls <jralls ceridwen us> wrote:
>> >> > The upgrade of Bison to version 3 which you graciously provided breaks the WebKit build, which you also graciously provided. ISTR that you mumbled something about working on building a newer WebKit version. Are you?
>> >> >
>> >> > Yes! It's been a bit pre-empted by other stuff, but I am still working on building WebKit 2.4.7. [...]
>> [...] should I perhaps keep the old WebKit 1.x module intact, and instead add a new one for webkitgtk 2.x? I might have to add a new one anyway since webkitgtk 2.x has discontinued the old WebKit 1 single-process API, and a lot of apps still depend on it. How about two new modules named webkit1gtk and webkit2gtk?
>
> Yes, I think that would be wise.
>
> How about just “webkit” and “webkit2” so that app modulesets don’t break gratuitously?
>
> Actually what I meant was keeping the existing one, and adding two more. All the APIs and version numbers are confusing but here's everything I'm proposing in a nutshell:
>
> - WebKit - WebKitGTK 1.x, WebKit 1 API, works with GTK 2.x (could be built for GTK 3.x but let's not bother)
> - webkit1gtk - WebKitGTK 2.4.x, WebKit 1 API, works with GTK 3.x
> - webkit2gtk - WebKitGTK >2.6, WebKit 2 API, works with GTK 3.x
>
> I picked "webkit2gtk" because that's what the pkg-config file calls itself and "webkit1gtk" in analogy to that. (Actually webkit1gtk's pkg-config file is called "webkitgtk" so that might be better for consistency but a more confusing name.)
Ah, got it.
Could we use ‘webkit[12]gtk3’ to make it clear that they’re gtk3-only?
That aside, the only way to deal with the confusion is to comment each module with what it’s for.
Yeah, saw that, I’ll make comments on the pull request.
I still get an error building libsoup, only on modulesets-unstable. I worked around it by adding --disable-introspection to libsoup's autogenargs in my local configuration file, since I assume it's a temporary problem. I haven't yet had time to pinpoint where it came from, though. Have you seen this before at all?
GISCAN Soup-2.4.gir
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Users/fliep/gtk/inst/bin/g-ir-scanner", line 55, in <module>
sys.exit(scanner_main(sys.argv))
File "/Users/fliep/gtk/inst/lib/gobject-introspection/giscanner/scannermain.py", line 517, in scanner_main
ss = create_source_scanner(options, args)
File "/Users/fliep/gtk/inst/lib/gobject-introspection/giscanner/scannermain.py", line 430, in create_source_scanner
ss.parse_files(filenames)
File "/Users/fliep/gtk/inst/lib/gobject-introspection/giscanner/sourcescanner.py", line 256, in parse_files
self._parse(headers)
File "/Users/fliep/gtk/inst/lib/gobject-introspection/giscanner/sourcescanner.py", line 302, in _parse
proc.stdin.write('#ifndef %s\n' % (define, ))
IOError: [Errno 32] Broken pipe
make[3]: *** [Soup-2.4.gir] Error 1
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [all] Error 2
No, but I haven’t tried building libsoup in unstable recently. Looks like a g-ir-scanner bug, though. Someone changed the format to use only one arg and screwed up by forgetting to remove the comma in the now-single-member tuple.
