Re: Is gtk-fb still actively maintained?

Modern Xorg is actually a lot more lightweight than you might think.
You might be surprised.

On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Woody Wu <narkewoody gmail com> wrote:

On Saturday, March 12, 2016, Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi gmail com> wrote:


On 12 March 2016 at 15:07, Woody Wu <narkewoody gmail com> wrote:
Does the ability of gtk can run directly on a frame buffer without X
sill be
actively developed and supported?

No, it hasn't been developed in a very, very long time. The
framebuffer backend has been removed ages ago in the 2.x series, and
it's not available on 3.x; same for the DirectFB backend.

Thanks for the info. It saved my time.

I am hesitate to install a Xorg sever on a
small device.  Thanks.

I don't see the issue. If it can run GTK then it most definitely can run

Yes, it can, but need more space and memory.


[ ] ebassi [ gmail com]

Life is the only flaw in an otherwise perfect nonexistence
    -- Schopenhauer

public key at (narkewoody gmail com)

gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list gnome org


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]