Re: Question about dbus ifaces

[Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi gmail com>]

Hi;

You probably want to ask on gtk-devel-list, but I can give you a quick answer: those interfaces are still considered unstable and may be subject to change while we explore the various issues of exposing them. Once they get more stable, they will be proposed on XDG-list. If you notice, org.gtk.Application is already partially exposed as org.freedesktop.Application after a round of discussions on fd.o.

As to the "it's simple" remark, we'll have to disagree. :-) there's nothing more time consuming than proposing a spec on freedesktop.org, so we generally do that once we have a pretty good idea of the problem space.

Ciao,

 Emmanuele.

On Friday, 6 March 2015, Konstantin P. <ria freelander gmail com> wrote:

I see for now GNOME have many "semi-private" dbus interfaces like org.gtk.Menus, org.gtk.Application, org.gtk.Actions and even org.gtk.Notifications (altrough org.freedesktop.Notifications exists).

Why GNOME does not send these interfaces to FDO review? It is in fact very simple, AFAIK.

-- 
https://www.bassi.io
[ ] ebassi [@gmail.com]