Hi Stefan, 2014-03-03 0:34 GMT+01:00 Stefan Salewski <mail ssalewski de>:
On Sun, 2014-03-02 at 23:29 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:The link I have sent in two of my emails points to a gerrit review, where I have marked the relevant parts. Could you please check it? It should do as fine as a minimal example to experienced eyes.I saw the link already some days ago -- but I am only an average GTK developer, far from an expert... One remark: In your code: gtk_icon_theme_add_builtin_icon(pixmaps[i].name, GTK_ICON_SIZE_MENU, pixbuf); gtk_icon_theme_add_builtin_icon(pixmaps[i].name, GTK_ICON_SIZE_SMALL_TOOLBAR, pixbuf); From GTK documentation: https://developer.gnome.org/gtk3/stable/GtkIconTheme.html#gtk-icon-theme-add-builtin-iconsize: the size at which to register the icon (different images can be registered for the same icon name at different sizes.)But you register the same pixbuf object for various sizes. It was my feeling, that you should specify not the desired, but the actual size. See bottom most answer here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12521134/gtktoolbutton-with-custom-icon-but-of-stock-icon-size
Thank you for the hints. The size was wrong for the icons, indeed. The migration is almost perfect now, I just need to figure out why the toolbar icons are not shown when they overflow the toolbar width. I have attached two minor patches for GTK+. One clarifies the size parameter usage, one helps compiling GTK+ apps with -Wc++-compat. Cheers, Balint
Attachment:
0001-documentation-clarify-gtk_icon_theme_add_builtin_ico.patch
Description: Text Data
Attachment:
0002-use-instead-of-and-in-deprecation-warnings.patch
Description: Text Data