Re: g_assert vs. g_return_if_fail
- From: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad behdad org>
- To: Jiří Zárevúcky <zarevucky jiri gmail com>
- Cc: Gtk+ <gtk-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: g_assert vs. g_return_if_fail
- Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:48:06 -0500
On 01/20/2010 04:38 PM, Jiří Zárevúcky wrote:
> Behdad Esfahbod píše v St 20. 01. 2010 v 13:18 -0500:
>> On 01/20/2010 02:03 PM, Martin Kalbfuß wrote:
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> But why is it a disastrous idea?
>>>
>>> When It's a clear programming error, why not abort the program with
>>> g_assert?
>>
>> Because that can cause user data loss.
>>
>> behdad
>
> So there are two possibilities: g_assert when you want the application
> to abort, and g_return_if_fail when you don't. g_assert can be disabled
> compile-time for a release, right? In that case, it does nothing.
>
> So why not add a compile option to make g_return_if_fail fatal, and
> simply deprecate g_assert? What is the point of having it there?
Can you please first state the problem you are trying to solve?
behdad
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]