Re: Fwd: GTK+ is real object oriented?

[Gerald Britton <gerald britton gmail com>]

Nicely put!

On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Michael Natterer <mitch gimp org> wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 16:16 -0200, frederico schardong wrote:
>
>> The difference is that not a really object-oriented, is a fake object-oriented.
>>
>> I call it fake object-oriented environment, maybe not the most
>> correctly name, but i think is true.
>>
>> What do you think?
>
> Object oriented is a programming paradigm, not a computer
> language. Just because C lacks the syntactic sugar to do OO
> in a more compact way says *nothing* about the possibility
> to use it for OO programming. It is after all turing complete.
>
> There is nothing "fake" here.
>
> The fact that a gas oven has a much nicer user interface
> doesn't make an old wood-fired stone oven a "fake" oven.
>
> ciao,
> --mitch
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gtk-list mailing list
> gtk-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
>



-- 
Gerald Britton