Re: Fwd: GTK+ is real object oriented?
- From: Michael Natterer <mitch gimp org>
- To: frederico schardong <frede sch gmail com>
- Cc: gtk-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Fwd: GTK+ is real object oriented?
- Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:26:24 +0100
On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 16:16 -0200, frederico schardong wrote:
> The difference is that not a really object-oriented, is a fake object-oriented.
>
> I call it fake object-oriented environment, maybe not the most
> correctly name, but i think is true.
>
> What do you think?
Object oriented is a programming paradigm, not a computer
language. Just because C lacks the syntactic sugar to do OO
in a more compact way says *nothing* about the possibility
to use it for OO programming. It is after all turing complete.
There is nothing "fake" here.
The fact that a gas oven has a much nicer user interface
doesn't make an old wood-fired stone oven a "fake" oven.
ciao,
--mitch
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]