Re: GTK+ is real object oriented?

On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 03:40:34PM -0200, frederico schardong wrote:
> The difference is that not a really object-oriented, is a fake object-oriented.
> I call it fake object-oriented environment, maybe not the most
> correctly name, but i think is true.
> What do you think?

I think you still did not give any definition of what real and fake
means.  At least for you since others will likely disagree whatever the
definition is.

So again, it is built around OO concepts and behaves like an OO
environment.  How can you tell it is a fake?


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]