Re: Pixbuf loading question

[Paul Davis <paul linuxaudiosystems com>]

On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 11:02 -0300, Diego Jacobi wrote:
> 
> That wont be a fix, instead a hack.
> 
> Whats the problem with this cache? It is suposed to be updated when
> you edit those files, so it is transparent to you if it exists or not.
> Why do you need the overhead?

he's not asking that.

if you're trying to optimize loading code you want to see the worst case
scenario. if the buffer cache makes everything super fast, you can't see
it.

of course, if the buffer cache makes everything super fast, you could
argue that there's nothing to speed up :)