Re: GTK+ 2.10.7 released
- From: Sergei Steshenko <sergstesh yahoo com>
- To: David "Nečas" <yeti physics muni cz>, gtk-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GTK+ 2.10.7 released
- Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 05:11:58 -0800 (PST)
--- David Neèas (Yeti) <yeti physics muni cz> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 04:44:40AM -0800, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
> >
> > My memory, of course, is not getting better as years go by, but it still
> > remembers some peculiar things.
> >
> > OK, on the official gtk site one can read:
> >
> > http://www.gtk.org/faq/#AEN703 :
> >
> > "
> > 5.28. Why does GTK+/GLib leak memory?
> >
> > It doesn't.
> > ...
> > ".
>
> a) You completely missed the point of 5.28, or did not even
> read the `...' part.
> b) You are trolling and therefore intentionally misinterpreting
> the FAQ item.
>
> Which one is it?
>
> Yeti
>
>
I did read the `...' part.
But what matters to me is that the 5.28 FAQ says gtk+ does not leak memory,
while I see 9 memory leaks related fixed bugs.
I didn't claim that gtk+-2.8.20 had memory leaks, my point was that
if I see 9 memory leaks related bugs fixed, can I at all trust the claim
about no memory leaks ?
So, that's why I asked the questions I asked and suggested the clarification
of "It doesn't" claim by splitting into two separate statements - one for
gtk+-2.8.20 and the other for 2.10.*.
--Sergei.
Applications From Scratch: http://appsfromscratch.berlios.de/
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]