Re: RFC: GObject FAQ

[Tiago Cogumbreiro <cogumbreiro linus uac pt>]

Of course we can, I actually started this in order to gather as much
feedback as possible, therefore if you have anything at all you're more
then welcome to merge it. As a side not this document was a 20 minutes
hack and might even contain some bugs, today I've looked it up more
carefully and nailed a few in the Interface related questions.

Anyway, I await your commits. I can add a public wiki for this, is it a
good idea?

On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 00:21, Ryan McDougall wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-25-08 at 02:39 +0000, Tiago Cogumbreiro wrote:
> > Hello list,
> > 
> > I've just created a GObject FAQ where I try to answer, hopefully
> > correctly, some questions I've had while programming with GObject.
> > 
> > http://s1x.homelinux.net/documents/gtk/gobject-faq.html
> > 
> > I would like to receive comments on bugs/typos it may contain as well as
> > more entries if needed. Next thing I intend to do is to explain:
> > - how interfaces should be implemented more throughly
> > - properties
> > - signals
> > 
> > PS: That page also contains a simple guide on threaded programing which
> > I've already brought to the list and some thoughts about Signals versus
> > Listeners Interfaces.
> > 
> > Thank you all for your time,
> > 
> > Tiago Cogumbreiro
> > 
> 
> Hi Tiago,
> 
> 	I recently did a similar thing: writing down the answers to my own
> questions as I learnt GObject. However there are some differences. My
> text is really ugly, not like your site which is quite nice. My
> perspective tries not just to state how GObject currently is, but to
> also justify *why* it is that way -- in other words I try to ask myself
> how would I do OO in C. 
> 
> 	So my question to you is can we collaborate? I think I have more text
> than you currently, so I would like to merge your text with mine, then
> mark the result up and post it on your site with credits to both of us.
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> Cheers,
> Ryan