Re: atk-1.03

[Christopher Schadl <cschadl satan org uk>]

On 2002.11.19 06:48 Michael Honeyfield wrote:
> Thanks for the info. The problem is atk cannt find glib2 which I do 
> have installed.

I would guess that its a problem with pkg-config.  Do you have 
PKG_CONFIG_PATH set to the correct directory?  If you compiled glib2 
from source, the glib-2.0.pc file will probably be found in 
/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig, which may not be searched by default.  
Otherwise, send the lines from config.log pertaining to glib2 not being 
found.

> Owen Taylor wrote:
> > Michael Honeyfield <honeyfield maxnet co nz> writes:
> >
> >
> > > Greeting gnomers,
> > >
> > > 	I am trying to compile the base gnome 2 stuff on a system that
> > > has no gnome libs. My problem is tha when I do ./configure it can 
> > > not
> > > seem to find glib2 which I have installed. I also have glib 
> > > installed
> > > and that works. I have tried every possible configure option that I
> > > can think of. glib2 has been installed into /usr/lib. Am I missing
> > > something? Do I really need atk?
> >
> >
> > Have you read:
> >
> >  http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/gtk/gtk-building.html
> >
> > That gives a step-by-step description of how to build through
> > GTK+. (And yes, you do need ATK.)
> >
> > Regards,
> >                                         Owen
>
> --
> Its not like Novell, it isnt going to run out of money. It started 
> off bankrupt.
>
> -- Steve Ballmer on Linux
>
> _______________________________________________
> gtk-list mailing list
> gtk-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list