Re: Memprof equivalent?

[Dave Benson <daveb ffem org>]

Nope, gskdebug.[ch] are explicitly independent of the rest of gsk.

There's no special timetable for GSK, since I'm hoping to
upgrade to the glib object system before 1.0.

It needs GMainContext support too; one of its features is
being able to use real signal-driven IO or kqueue() under bsd
or /dev/poll under Solaris transparently; but some work is needed
to support the glib idle funcs etc...  (and i'm not even trying til
GMainContext....)

OTOH: i'm using it enough that major interface changes,
except that object system switch, are very unlikely.

- Dave

On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 11:40:13AM -0800, Eric M. Monsler wrote:
> Dave,
> 
> This sounds like exactly the kind of thing I need.
> 
> One question: Does the gskdebug require the full library, or can I just
> hook in gskdebug.[ch] for debugging and remove it later?
> 
> I'd rather not add a permanent library dependence to my project, at this
> point.
> 
> If I had known about GSK before I started, I might have used it
> everywhere and saved myself some work.  Oh well.  What's missing, btw,
> before a 1.0 release?  (OK, two questions)
> 
> 
> Eric

--