Re: odd question...
- From: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- To: winterlion <winterlion fsj net>
- Cc: <gtk-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: odd question...
- Date: 09 Feb 2001 00:14:56 -0500
winterlion <winterlion fsj net> writes:
> Is there any looking into upgrading the <CVS>/gtk+/examples directory to
> actually support gtk-2.0? :)
I think we'll probably be moving to using demos/gtk-demo instead and
getting rid of examples. Though, examples is part of the GTK tutorial,
so may get updated with the tutorial. Anyway, demos/gtk-demo is the
thing the GTK team is planning to do, if examples gets updated the
tutorial guys will probably be doing that work.
> (SOO much has changed...)
Really, not that much has changed. ;-) Look at docs/Changes-2.0.txt
for some useful notes on changes. Mostly though it's additions rather
than changes.
> actually the biggest problem so far has been to 'configure' scripts that
> expect gtk-config and family to work. The trouble is I have -no- idea how
> to fix these problems....
Replace "gtk-config --libs" with "pkg-config --libs gtk+-2.0"
> And note that a good portion of the rest of the gnome CVS has problems
> with this too (gnome-libs being a good example last I checked :)
>
That's why they call it the unstable branch ;-)
Havoc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]